Comment 2 for bug 1651638
Revision history for this message
| Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) wrote Re: Nested fullscreen interval 0 clients in Mir 0.25.0 had higher latency than interval 1 | #2 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
Using blind bisection I found the revision that fixed it. Rather obvious when you read the comment now...
-------
revno: 3827 [merge]
author: Kevin DuBois <email address hidden>
committer: Tarmac
branch nick: development-branch
timestamp: Thu 2016-11-17 08:45:49 +0000
message:
Have the host and nested-server agree on the swapinterval operation of a nested-client during passthrough. If the nested-client is using swapinterval 0, the nested-server has to tell the host not to queue up buffers in the host server. If the host server starts queueing up buffers, then the spare buffers the nested-client needs for swapinterval0 operation end up queueing in the host server.
Approved by mir-ci-bot, Alexandros Frantzis, Cemil Azizoglu.
-------