It is intentional. C.f. -c 2295 and -c 2316. From the former commit message:
Drop libmirclient8 dependency on client-platform drivers.
Similar to libX11, which doesn't depend on an X11 server.
This dependency is satisfied by other parts of the stack; the desktop-next and touch
seeds.
This implies that the seed ought to be pulling in the drivers.
I don't have a wily install to hand but it sounds like mir-graphics-drivers-desktop is still pulling mir-platform-graphics-mesa1. (Which is what it does on vivid.)
It is intentional. C.f. -c 2295 and -c 2316. From the former commit message:
Drop libmirclient8 dependency on client-platform drivers.
Similar to libX11, which doesn't depend on an X11 server.
This dependency is satisfied by other parts of the stack; the desktop-next and touch
seeds.
This implies that the seed ought to be pulling in the drivers.
I don't have a wily install to hand but it sounds like mir-graphics- drivers- desktop is still pulling mir-platform- graphics- mesa1. (Which is what it does on vivid.)