Log in / Register
Mir
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #1420334
Comment #3
Comment 3 for bug 1420334
Revision history for this message
Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt)
wrote
on 2015-03-13
:
Re: [enhancement] Missing client API for relative surface movement
#3
I've now proposed a common solution for this and other scenarios at the top of
bug 1420573
.
I've now proposed a common solution for this and other scenarios at the top of bug 1420573.
I've now proposed a common solution for this and other scenarios at the top of bug 1420573.