Comment 5 for bug 1318632
Revision history for this message
| Alan Griffiths (alan-griffiths) wrote | #5 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
OK I misunderstood that the problem was that the reference was to a mutating pointer. As that isn't the case then there's no problem with the timing of copying the smart pointer and the description is wrong.