Comment 6 for bug 596988

  Yes, I suppose actual proof of the problem would be good!
I took a brief look at the bugs and could not find any pair of bugs that
fit the scenario outlined in this bug.
I spoke with Sam and Jesse a bit more and it seems like we are stumped
on why we end up with so many "item already online" notices in the
uploader (meaning we unintentionally scanned an item twice). We've been
getting about one of these a day, sometimes more.

The position of "busy" in the upload filter led to the suspicion that
the scenario was possible but I'm not sure if it actually happened.
The other hypothesis, maybe more probable but also requiring
investigation, is that the physical reel is simply put on the wrong
shelf ("to-be-scanned instead" of "transferred")

On 8/19/10 6:32 PM, Hank Bromley wrote:
> I'm not sure that scenario is possible. (We can talk more about why, if
> we need to investigate more fully.) But let's assume it is - then if it
> did happen, the item should have two bugs filed for it, one (from the
> "no frames" error) with a request for the rescan, and one (from the
> archive.php redrow) with a request to delete the original files.
>
> So do we have items for which two such bugs have been filed?
>