Does it works better if you force the numbering of each processes?
generate p p > n1 c1 $ susystrong @1
add process p p > n1 c1 j $ susystrong @2
add process p p > n1 c1 j j $ susystrong @3
add process p p > n1 n2 $ susystrong @4
add process p p > n1 n2 j $ susystrong @5
add process p p > n1 n2 j j $ susystrong @6
add process p p > c1 n2 $ susystrong @7
add process p p > c1 n2 j $ susystrong @8
add process p p > c1 n2 j j $ susystrong @9
add process p p > c1 c1 $ susystrong @10
add process p p > c1 c1 j $ susystrong @11
add process p p > c1 c1 j j $ susystrong @12
Also what is the logic to generate all of them in one go?
I thought that for CKKW-L with Py8 (and simply for the matching scale) it would be better to have 4 separated computation.
Does it works better if you force the numbering of each processes?
generate p p > n1 c1 $ susystrong @1
add process p p > n1 c1 j $ susystrong @2
add process p p > n1 c1 j j $ susystrong @3
add process p p > n1 n2 $ susystrong @4
add process p p > n1 n2 j $ susystrong @5
add process p p > n1 n2 j j $ susystrong @6
add process p p > c1 n2 $ susystrong @7
add process p p > c1 n2 j $ susystrong @8
add process p p > c1 n2 j j $ susystrong @9
add process p p > c1 c1 $ susystrong @10
add process p p > c1 c1 j $ susystrong @11
add process p p > c1 c1 j j $ susystrong @12
Also what is the logic to generate all of them in one go?
I thought that for CKKW-L with Py8 (and simply for the matching scale) it would be better to have 4 separated computation.
Cheers,
Olivier