Comment 5 for bug 1468429
Revision history for this message
| Khaled Teilab (teilab) wrote Re: [Bug 1468429] Re: Form factors with transposed spinors bug | #5 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
73416ba
(Get the code!)
Hello Olivier,
actually -apart from the form factor- both models are exactly the same
...and... for the same process model1 produces very reasonable results !!!
MG only fails to calculate the process when form factors are included.
Cheers,
Khaled
On 27.06.2015 16:59, Olivier Mattelaer wrote:
> Dear Khaled,
>
> I have not try model1 so i can not comment on it.
> When I ran model3 after the modification that I mention before. MG refuses to make the computation for the process that you mention
> because it can not handle it. This is process specific, so it is possible that you test for another process, I do not know but if they are indeed the same model then I would expect both to fail.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
>
>
>