Activity log for bug #494564

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2009-12-09 16:05:56 Lionel Le Folgoc bug added bug
2009-12-09 16:07:42 Lionel Le Folgoc nominated for series medibuntu/hardy
2009-12-09 16:07:42 Lionel Le Folgoc bug task added medibuntu/hardy
2009-12-09 16:07:42 Lionel Le Folgoc nominated for series medibuntu/intrepid
2009-12-09 16:07:42 Lionel Le Folgoc bug task added medibuntu/intrepid
2009-12-09 16:07:42 Lionel Le Folgoc nominated for series medibuntu/karmic
2009-12-09 16:07:42 Lionel Le Folgoc bug task added medibuntu/karmic
2009-12-09 16:07:42 Lionel Le Folgoc nominated for series medibuntu/jaunty
2009-12-09 16:07:42 Lionel Le Folgoc bug task added medibuntu/jaunty
2009-12-09 16:07:42 Lionel Le Folgoc nominated for series medibuntu/lucid
2009-12-09 16:07:42 Lionel Le Folgoc bug task added medibuntu/lucid
2009-12-09 16:10:11 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/hardy: assignee Lionel Le Folgoc (mrpouit)
2009-12-09 16:10:14 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/intrepid: assignee Lionel Le Folgoc (mrpouit)
2009-12-09 16:10:16 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/karmic: assignee Lionel Le Folgoc (mrpouit)
2009-12-09 16:10:18 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/jaunty: assignee Lionel Le Folgoc (mrpouit)
2009-12-09 16:10:23 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/lucid: assignee Lionel Le Folgoc (mrpouit)
2009-12-09 22:11:17 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/lucid: status New Fix Released
2009-12-09 22:11:21 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/hardy: status New Fix Committed
2009-12-09 22:11:24 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/jaunty: status New Fix Committed
2009-12-09 22:11:26 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/karmic: status New Fix Committed
2009-12-09 22:11:28 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/intrepid: status New Fix Committed
2009-12-09 22:11:30 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/intrepid: importance Undecided High
2009-12-09 22:11:34 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/jaunty: importance Undecided High
2009-12-09 22:11:35 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/karmic: importance Undecided High
2009-12-09 22:11:36 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/hardy: importance Undecided High
2009-12-09 22:11:37 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/lucid: importance Undecided High
2010-01-22 17:36:35 Elad Tsur medibuntu/lucid: status Fix Released Confirmed
2010-01-22 17:36:56 Elad Tsur medibuntu/karmic: status Fix Committed Confirmed
2010-01-22 17:37:21 Elad Tsur medibuntu/jaunty: status Fix Committed Confirmed
2010-01-22 17:37:47 Elad Tsur medibuntu/intrepid: status Fix Committed Confirmed
2010-01-22 17:38:18 Elad Tsur medibuntu/hardy: status Fix Committed Confirmed
2010-01-22 20:48:42 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/lucid: status Confirmed Fix Released
2010-01-22 20:48:44 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/karmic: status Confirmed Fix Committed
2010-01-22 20:48:46 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/jaunty: status Confirmed Fix Committed
2010-01-22 20:48:48 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/intrepid: status Confirmed Fix Committed
2010-01-22 20:48:50 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/hardy: status Confirmed Fix Committed
2010-01-22 21:19:17 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/hardy: status Fix Committed Fix Released
2010-01-22 21:19:19 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/intrepid: status Fix Committed Fix Released
2010-01-22 21:19:27 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/jaunty: status Fix Committed Fix Released
2010-01-22 21:19:28 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/karmic: status Fix Committed Fix Released
2010-01-29 13:02:00 fgaimard medibuntu/karmic: status Fix Released New
2010-01-29 13:27:55 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/karmic: status New Fix Released
2010-02-02 12:16:05 Przemek K. description It is a bit problematic to keep our skype packages, as skype-common conflicts with the package distributed on skype.com, and there's no easy way for us to avoid that (except by merging back skype-common in skype and skype-static, which is a bit painful). After some discussion on irc with a skype dev, I think the best proposition is to stop distributing them, as they are apparently going to provide i386 & amd64 & skype-static packages on skype.com. For the moment, I'm going to move them to -staging, and after packages are released on skype.com, drop them completely. It is a bit problematic to keep our skype packages, as skype-common conflicts with the package distributed on skype.com, and there's no easy way for us to avoid that (except by merging back skype-common in skype and skype-static, which is a bit painful). After some discussion on irc with a skype dev, I think the best proposition is to stop distributing them, as they are apparently going to provide i386 & amd64 & skype-static packages on skype.com. For the moment, I'm going to move them to -staging, and after packages are released on skype.com, drop them completely. =================================== STOP ASKING ABOUT BRINGING SKYPE BACK TO UBUNTU. Skype is proprietary closed source software so Ubuntu developers can't modify it and don't have access to its source code. If you want something changed about Skype then you should ask the vendor of the Skype application, not Ubuntu. https://support.skype.com/en/support_selection If Skype's vendor wants to have its packages in Ubuntu then it is their responsibility to work on that, not Ubuntu's. Blaming Ubuntu or Medibuntu about not including Skype is just plain wrong. Please, DO NOT ADD any more comments about bringing Skype back. The decision has been made, period. Go ask Skype about it.
2010-02-02 12:16:26 Przemek K. description It is a bit problematic to keep our skype packages, as skype-common conflicts with the package distributed on skype.com, and there's no easy way for us to avoid that (except by merging back skype-common in skype and skype-static, which is a bit painful). After some discussion on irc with a skype dev, I think the best proposition is to stop distributing them, as they are apparently going to provide i386 & amd64 & skype-static packages on skype.com. For the moment, I'm going to move them to -staging, and after packages are released on skype.com, drop them completely. =================================== STOP ASKING ABOUT BRINGING SKYPE BACK TO UBUNTU. Skype is proprietary closed source software so Ubuntu developers can't modify it and don't have access to its source code. If you want something changed about Skype then you should ask the vendor of the Skype application, not Ubuntu. https://support.skype.com/en/support_selection If Skype's vendor wants to have its packages in Ubuntu then it is their responsibility to work on that, not Ubuntu's. Blaming Ubuntu or Medibuntu about not including Skype is just plain wrong. Please, DO NOT ADD any more comments about bringing Skype back. The decision has been made, period. Go ask Skype about it. It is a bit problematic to keep our skype packages, as skype-common conflicts with the package distributed on skype.com, and there's no easy way for us to avoid that (except by merging back skype-common in skype and skype-static, which is a bit painful). After some discussion on irc with a skype dev, I think the best proposition is to stop distributing them, as they are apparently going to provide i386 & amd64 & skype-static packages on skype.com. For the moment, I'm going to move them to -staging, and after packages are released on skype.com, drop them completely. =================================== STOP ASKING ABOUT BRINGING SKYPE BACK TO MEDIBUNTU. Skype is proprietary closed source software so Ubuntu developers can't modify it and don't have access to its source code. If you want something changed about Skype then you should ask the vendor of the Skype application, not Ubuntu. https://support.skype.com/en/support_selection If Skype's vendor wants to have its packages in Ubuntu then it is their responsibility to work on that, not Ubuntu's. Blaming Ubuntu or Medibuntu about not including Skype is just plain wrong. Please, DO NOT ADD any more comments about bringing Skype back. The decision has been made, period. Go ask Skype about it.
2010-03-16 03:00:03 shawn2880 medibuntu/karmic: assignee Lionel Le Folgoc (mrpouit) shawn2880 (shawn2880)
2010-03-16 06:31:33 Lionel Le Folgoc medibuntu/karmic: assignee shawn2880 (shawn2880) Lionel Le Folgoc (mrpouit)
2010-05-24 19:16:11 Søren Holm removed subscriber Søren Holm
2012-02-24 00:20:31 Kai Kasurinen removed subscriber Kai Kasurinen