(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > Well for me it's a real bug.
>
> ?!
?! = why ?
I have a local mirror with only the x86_64 repository aka core, nonfree and tainted with (release, updates, updates_testing, backports, backports_testing)
And and online reposity for i586 core (release, updates, updates_testing, backports, backports_testing) .
If I install a x86_64 package who require or suggest a noarch package, the noarch package is not pick on my local repo but on the online one.
So why should I again download a package that I have already on my local repo ? (noarch on i586 and x86_64 are the same)
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > Well for me it's a real bug.
>
> ?!
?! = why ?
I have a local mirror with only the x86_64 repository aka core, nonfree and tainted with (release, updates, updates_testing, backports, backports_testing)
And and online reposity for i586 core (release, updates, updates_testing, backports, backports_testing) .
If I install a x86_64 package who require or suggest a noarch package, the noarch package is not pick on my local repo but on the online one.
So why should I again download a package that I have already on my local repo ? (noarch on i586 and x86_64 are the same)