This seems "out of place" for MM, per se. Providing this material is something that is intimately tied to the archiver.
As I see it, the only thing that MM can do is to provide a "pass thru" conduit to whatever archiver the installation has chosen.
Wacky
On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I think we'll probably do something like this in Mailman 3, but also,
> I'm much more fond of providing a Gmane-like NNTP interface to the
> archives. I find myself subscribing to fewer mailing lists these days
> and just reading (and replying!) to them via Gmane. Works great.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman
> Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283751
>
> Title:
> feature request: fetch archived emails
This seems "out of place" for MM, per se. Providing this material is something that is intimately tied to the archiver.
As I see it, the only thing that MM can do is to provide a "pass thru" conduit to whatever archiver the installation has chosen.
Wacky
On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I think we'll probably do something like this in Mailman 3, but also, /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 283751
> I'm much more fond of providing a Gmane-like NNTP interface to the
> archives. I find myself subscribing to fewer mailing lists these days
> and just reading (and replying!) to them via Gmane. Works great.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman
> Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> feature request: fetch archived emails