After some investigation, the following (admittedly invalid) date headers
cause tracebacks similar to the above. After reformatting them I'm able to
generate the archive.
Date: 25 Aug 95 18.00
Date: Thursday, 30 October 1997 3:02pm PT
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 Pacific Standard Time
Note that these messages *didn't* cause bin/arch|pipermail in mailman
2.0.x to fail, though it probably didn't parse them properly. Perhaps
trapping the error and/or skipping these messages might be more useful?
It also appears that bin/arch is throwing all messages with dates it can't
figure out (after the above were removed) into the current day. An example
can be seen at http://lists.samurai.com/pipermail/bryans-list/2003-January/thread.html .
I'm unsure if there's any way to better handle this, but just wanted to
note it - I can create a separate bug report if it's important.
After some investigation, the following (admittedly invalid) date headers
cause tracebacks similar to the above. After reformatting them I'm able to
generate the archive.
Date: 25 Aug 95 18.00
Date: Thursday, 30 October 1997 3:02pm PT
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 Pacific Standard Time
Note that these messages *didn't* cause bin/arch|pipermail in mailman
2.0.x to fail, though it probably didn't parse them properly. Perhaps
trapping the error and/or skipping these messages might be more useful?
It also appears that bin/arch is throwing all messages with dates it can't lists.samurai. com/pipermail/ bryans- list/2003- January/ thread. html .
figure out (after the above were removed) into the current day. An example
can be seen at
http://
I'm unsure if there's any way to better handle this, but just wanted to
note it - I can create a separate bug report if it's important.
Thanks,
Bryan