On 06/25/2014 03:43 PM, jimpop wrote:
> IMO, if dmarc_moderation_action is Reject/Discard, then the moderator
> queue should be empty. Otherwise Munge/Wrap should still occur (based
> on dmarc_moderation_action) once a pending message is approved.
The issue is that the message is held by SpamDetect because of a
header_filter_rules action. It is then approved by a moderator and
processed through the remainder of the pipeline, but because it had
already been approved, Moderate.process returned without ever checking
dmarc_moderate_action.
So even though dmarc_moderation should have applied to this message, it
didn't because the message was held by a prior handler and approved and
the moderator's approval overrode any dmarc_moderation_action.
--
Mark Sapiro <email address hidden> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
On 06/25/2014 03:43 PM, jimpop wrote: n_action is Reject/Discard, then the moderator n_action) once a pending message is approved.
> IMO, if dmarc_moderatio
> queue should be empty. Otherwise Munge/Wrap should still occur (based
> on dmarc_moderatio
The issue is that the message is held by SpamDetect because of a action.
header_filter_rules action. It is then approved by a moderator and
processed through the remainder of the pipeline, but because it had
already been approved, Moderate.process returned without ever checking
dmarc_moderate_
So even though dmarc_moderation should have applied to this message, it n_action.
didn't because the message was held by a prior handler and approved and
the moderator's approval overrode any dmarc_moderatio
--
Mark Sapiro <email address hidden> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan