"I guess it might be better if I just explained what I really want, which is the ability to add @listC to the members of listB such that listA, which has accept_these_nonmembers set to @listB, can be sent to unmoderated by members of listC."
And wouldn't this be the case if @listC was in listB's accept_these_nonmembers and @listB was in listA's accept_these_nonmembers and accept_these_nonmembers were processed recursively?
As far as allowing members of a regular_include_lists list to post is concerned, this is already easily accomplished by simply adding the @LISTNAME to accept_these_nonmembers at the same time as you add the list posting address to regular_include_lists.
So it still seems to me that you can easily accomplish everything you ask if *these_nonmembers were processed recursively.
If this is not the case, please give an example of what would not be configurable in this way.
"I guess it might be better if I just explained what I really want, which is the ability to add @listC to the members of listB such that listA, which has accept_ these_nonmember s set to @listB, can be sent to unmoderated by members of listC."
And wouldn't this be the case if @listC was in listB's accept_ these_nonmember s and @listB was in listA's accept_ these_nonmember s and accept_ these_nonmember s were processed recursively?
As far as allowing members of a regular_ include_ lists list to post is concerned, this is already easily accomplished by simply adding the @LISTNAME to accept_ these_nonmember s at the same time as you add the list posting address to regular_ include_ lists.
So it still seems to me that you can easily accomplish everything you ask if *these_nonmembers were processed recursively.
If this is not the case, please give an example of what would not be configurable in this way.