When monitoring a POP3 mailbox, Mail Notification reports all messages as new.
This is caused by limitations in the POP3 protocol. You
should configure your mail reader so that it deletes mail
from the server after downloading it.
In the light of this, is there any way for Mail-Notification not to report POP3 mails as "new", but as "in the mailbox" or "on the server" for example?
In the mail summary, "Mailboxes having new mail" could read "Mailboxes having mail".
This way users won't be confused by the "new" label for email that has been read on the server.
I see here that there is a way to recognise new mail using UIDL's:
"When retrieving new messages, an IMAP client requests the UIDs greater than the highest UID among all previously-retrieved messages, whereas a POP client must fetch the entire UIDL map. For large mailboxes, this can require significant processing."
Is this the reason Mail-Notification does not use UIDL's?
I found this in the help file.
When monitoring a POP3 mailbox, Mail Notification reports all messages as new.
This is caused by limitations in the POP3 protocol. You
should configure your mail reader so that it deletes mail
from the server after downloading it.
In the light of this, is there any way for Mail-Notification not to report POP3 mails as "new", but as "in the mailbox" or "on the server" for example?
In the mail summary, "Mailboxes having new mail" could read "Mailboxes having mail".
This way users won't be confused by the "new" label for email that has been read on the server.
I see here that there is a way to recognise new mail using UIDL's:
http:// en.wikipedia. org/wiki/ Post_Office_ Protocol www.example- code.com/ vb/read- pop3-unread- email.asp
http://
But large mailboxes present a problem:
"When retrieving new messages, an IMAP client requests the UIDs greater than the highest UID among all previously- retrieved messages, whereas a POP client must fetch the entire UIDL map. For large mailboxes, this can require significant processing."
Is this the reason Mail-Notification does not use UIDL's?