On Sun, 25 May 2008 13:11:29 -0000
AZ <email address hidden> wrote:
> @Jean-Yves Lefort: Thanks for pointing out that this patch is not yet perfect ;). But apart from the mistakes I corrected,
> most of the gnutls related code is rather almost copy&paste from gnutls documentation
> so I don't expect too much errors . Perhaps you could point out qualitity shartfalls because I'm not afraid of
> improving my own coding style ;)
It would be rather pointless. Since I don't agree with the idea of
adding GnuTLS support, I don't want to encourage you in that way.
On Sun, 25 May 2008 13:11:29 -0000
AZ <email address hidden> wrote:
> @Jean-Yves Lefort: Thanks for pointing out that this patch is not yet perfect ;). But apart from the mistakes I corrected,
> most of the gnutls related code is rather almost copy&paste from gnutls documentation
> so I don't expect too much errors . Perhaps you could point out qualitity shartfalls because I'm not afraid of
> improving my own coding style ;)
It would be rather pointless. Since I don't agree with the idea of
adding GnuTLS support, I don't want to encourage you in that way.
--
Jean-Yves Lefort <email address hidden>