@Julian: that changeset appears to be included in lm-sensors 3.3.0, which is now packaged in Debian. We're carrying a couple of deltas from Debian which is preventing a sync to the latest version. I've subscribed Micah and Bryce to get their feedback, but I think at least two of the deltas can be dropped:
@Julian: that changeset appears to be included in lm-sensors 3.3.0, which is now packaged in Debian. We're carrying a couple of deltas from Debian which is preventing a sync to the latest version. I've subscribed Micah and Bryce to get their feedback, but I think at least two of the deltas can be dropped:
lm-sensors-3 (1:3.2.0-1ubuntu3) oneiric; urgency=low
* fix sensors-detect won't recognize 3.0 kernel fix to handle
older versions correctly. (LP: #797001)
-- Andy Whitcroft <email address hidden> Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:01:05 +0100
lm-sensors-3 (1:3.2.0-1ubuntu2) oneiric; urgency=low
* fix LP: #797001 - sensors-detect won't recognize 3.0 kernel patches/ 101_detect_ 3_0_kernel_ version. patch patches/ series
- add debian/
- update debian/
-- Micah Gersten <email address hidden> Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:04:24 -0500
lm-sensors-3 (1:3.2.0-1ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low
* Add 100_recommend_ using_upstart. patch: Recommend use of upstart rather
than init-script. (Thanks Michael Basse)
(LP: #741338)
-- Bryce Harrington <email address hidden> Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:39:13 -0700
I don't know for sure, but I think we may still want to carry the upstart one, in which case, we'll need to do a merge instead of a sync request.
Also note that as of lm-sensors 1:3.3.0-4 the source package was renamed to just "lm-sensors"