Comment 41 for bug 1805920
Revision history for this message
| Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer) wrote | #41 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
Thank Vern for outlining your testcase.
@Vern
Doesn't that also have to include some component that does QoS management adding the VLAN-0 tag?
I don't have the systems to verify this case on Bionic and Cosmic.
As I read it from Vern he can only test Bionic at the Customer and is unsure he can test Cosmic the same way.
@MAAS team - Would you have a MAAS tets environment that you can re-use to verify this?
If so could you confirm that you can locally trigger the bug as it is today so that we can rely on it on SRU processing?
@Vern - if above is Nack'ed by the MAAS team could you ask if you could if could get nodes to verify that on Cosmic as well. As I read your test description I think it would be enough to bump the node that is supposed to start the guest to Cosmic+Proposed then - no need to update all systems to Cosmic.