This one is puzzling, because it seems that we get an error saying that the address already exists, *just* after we check to be sure it doesn't exist yet. *And*, according to the database, it in fact *doesn't* exist.
At this point I'm suspecting that there is some flaw in the way we're setting up the transactions in the database...
This one is puzzling, because it seems that we get an error saying that the address already exists, *just* after we check to be sure it doesn't exist yet. *And*, according to the database, it in fact *doesn't* exist.
At this point I'm suspecting that there is some flaw in the way we're setting up the transactions in the database...