Comment 4 for bug 1442280

+1 for moving the statuses around.

I think I would prefer the statuses to be ordered not alphabetically, but logically. That way you could see the node counts "flowing" down during deployment. For example:

    NEW = 0
    COMMISSIONING = 1
    FAILED_COMMISSIONING = 2
    # not sure where "disk erasing" belongs
    DISK_ERASING = 14
    READY = 4
    RESERVED = 5
    ALLOCATED = 10
    RELEASING = 12
    DEPLOYING = 9
    DEPLOYED = 6

    # exceptional conditions
    # (put these at the bottom? indicate with a color and/or icon?
    # or separate with spacing, so they stand out?)
    MISSING = 3
    RETIRED = 7
    BROKEN = 8
    FAILED_DEPLOYMENT = 11
    FAILED_RELEASING = 13
    FAILED_DISK_ERASING = 15