Comment 9 for bug 1389007

On Wednesday 12 Nov 2014 13:09:26 you wrote:
> On 12 November 2014 12:58, Andres Rodriguez <email address hidden> wrote:
> > so that means we will be able to handle ~1600 nodes?
>
> This wins for most beautifully ironic bug comment this week.
>
> I think we need to come up with a plan for chunking big blobs like
> this. After all, the cluster doesn't know how many nodes it manages
> until the region tells it, so there shouldn't be a bottleneck on
> telling-the-cluster-what-its-nodes-are.
>
> (Worth noting too that this is the *only* place (AFAIK) where we batch
> up node power options like this; everywhere else we do power stuff one
> node at a time.)

I think that paging the responses is a good approach to take generally,
perhaps this particular message needs a change to do that.