On Wednesday 22 Oct 2014 23:18:24 you wrote:
> On 22 October 2014 23:56, Graham Binns <email address hidden> wrote:
> > $GENERATE 1-254 $.$.0.10.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR no-name-yet-$.$.maas.
> >
> > But a quick check of that on my local MAAS suggests it doesn't work.
> > I'll dig further tomorrow.
>
> Nope, scratch that, it works fine. Well, named-checkzone generates a
> perfectly valid set of rules, but strangely the reverse lookup itself
> doesn't work. Definitely more poking to be done on the morrow.
>
> For a /23 (or some other such fun thing), yes, I think we'd have to
> write
>
> $GENERATE 1-254 $.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR no-name-yet-$.maas.
> $GENERATE 1-254 $.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR no-name-yet-$.maas.
>
> Again. More `dig`ing (geddit?) tomorrow.
On Wednesday 22 Oct 2014 23:18:24 you wrote: in-addr. arpa. IN PTR no-name- yet-$.$ .maas. 192.in- addr.arpa. IN PTR no-name-yet-$.maas. 192.in- addr.arpa. IN PTR no-name-yet-$.maas.
> On 22 October 2014 23:56, Graham Binns <email address hidden> wrote:
> > $GENERATE 1-254 $.$.0.10.
> >
> > But a quick check of that on my local MAAS suggests it doesn't work.
> > I'll dig further tomorrow.
>
> Nope, scratch that, it works fine. Well, named-checkzone generates a
> perfectly valid set of rules, but strangely the reverse lookup itself
> doesn't work. Definitely more poking to be done on the morrow.
>
> For a /23 (or some other such fun thing), yes, I think we'd have to
> write
>
> $GENERATE 1-254 $.0.168.
> $GENERATE 1-254 $.1.168.
>
> Again. More `dig`ing (geddit?) tomorrow.
See the related bug 1356012 about that.