On Friday 07 Feb 2014 10:59:36 you wrote:
> > If we have a separate API call will it solve the problem with the
>
> signals? I suspect not, but asking anyway :)
>
> Actually, funny that you should mention this because Jeroen and I have been
> having the exact same thought: If we save the object using obj.save() then
> the signals will be fired… but if we use update() then we're good because
> update() doesn't call the signals.
Interesting. It sounds dangerous and useful at the same time :)
On Friday 07 Feb 2014 10:59:36 you wrote:
> > If we have a separate API call will it solve the problem with the
>
> signals? I suspect not, but asking anyway :)
>
> Actually, funny that you should mention this because Jeroen and I have been
> having the exact same thought: If we save the object using obj.save() then
> the signals will be fired… but if we use update() then we're good because
> update() doesn't call the signals.
Interesting. It sounds dangerous and useful at the same time :)
Are you thinking of using it?