Comment 5 for bug 1062340
Revision history for this message
| Julian Edwards (julian-edwards) wrote Re: [Bug 1062340] Re: juju provider interacts poorly with arch constraints | #5 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
On Monday 08 October 2012 07:26:04 you wrote:
> I was surprised too! I think the intention is to support a basic minimum
> set of constraints that are common across providers but also lead to
> sane defaults. I think this may need to be revised at some point. But I
> think it does make sense to make MAAS map "arm" to something sensible
> (which I take to be armhf/* since we're Ubuntu Server).
Does this mean juju will break when more arm formats are added, or is "arm"
just a default?