i dont see any sort of explanation as to why a dependency is not appropriate. I see a.) stgraber agreeing that there should be a dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flash-kernel/+bug/1160360/comments/5 b.) loic suggesting that some other piece of software should be used to decide which packages to install https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flash-kernel/+bug/1160488/comments/1
why is it not possible to do the right thing?
Why couldn't whatever logic is used to decide "should I install flash-kernel" instead be used at runtime?
i dont see any sort of explanation as to why a dependency is not appropriate. I see /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ flash-kernel/ +bug/1160360/ comments/ 5 /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ flash-kernel/ +bug/1160488/ comments/ 1
a.) stgraber agreeing that there should be a dependency
https:/
b.) loic suggesting that some other piece of software should be used to decide which packages to install
https:/
why is it not possible to do the right thing?
Why couldn't whatever logic is used to decide "should I install flash-kernel" instead be used at runtime?