> ... or updating lxml will break a *lot* of code.
Well, it's certainly the first time I see this use case, so I may raise my doubts that it's all that common. But yes, it's a regression, so it should be fixed.
> ... or updating lxml will break a *lot* of code.
Well, it's certainly the first time I see this use case, so I may raise my doubts that it's all that common. But yes, it's a regression, so it should be fixed.