loggerhead

  1. Bug #701329
  2. Comment #36

Comment 36 for bug 701329

Revision history for this message
William Grant (wgrant) wrote :

I consider this OK to deploy. It does introduce a new OOPS (bug #726985), but in a case somewhat rarer than the one it fixed. It should be a net win on the OOPS count front, and the new OOPS does not constitute service degradation.