Comment 1 for bug 365981

Revision history for this message
Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhudson) wrote :

Well, um, yes, it /might/ be nice :)

I'm not sure what actual concrete benefits it would bring to replace the on-disk cache with memcached -- loading the data we currently store there from the sqlite is fast enough that you don't notice it amongst all the other stuff we do.

It would certainly be nice to not cache so much in memory, and funnily enough I've just submitted a branch for review that does this -- storing it in another sqlite database for now.