Comment 22 for bug 907055

I just received my first response to the patch I filed this morning at 11:44AM (EST).

The full response is as follows:

 > --- ./intel_lvds.old 2011-12-20 13:25:49.368291249 -0500
 > +++ ./intel_lvds.c 2011-12-20 13:26:05.160291248 -0500
 > @@ -709,6 +709,14 @@
 > },
 > {
 > .callback = intel_no_lvds_dmi_callback,
 > + .ident = "Clientron E830",
 > + .matches = {
 > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Clientron"),
 > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "E830"),
 > + },
 > + },
 > + {
 > + .callback = intel_no_lvds_dmi_callback,
 > .ident = "Asus EeeBox PC EB1007",
 > .matches = {
 > DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "ASUSTeK Computer INC."),
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <email address hidden>

- ajax

Unsure what reviewed consists of, but there does appear to be action on it.