On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Fathi Boudra <email address hidden> wrote:
> On 4 January 2012 15:56, Rob Clark <email address hidden> wrote:
>> it is orthogonal to gstreamer.. possibly we need to introduce an #if
>> defined(HAVE_EGLIMAGE) ..
>>
>> is it possible to just disable building on x86 for now? Ie. linaro
>> doesn't really need to release x86 packages.
>
> We have already done that as a workaround.
We were interested at the fix for basically 2 reasons:
1 - The common packages are generated by the x86 build at Launchpad
(the workaround was to have it all for armel only);
2 - We want our patches to not break the normal use case, so later on
we can also propose the changes at Ubuntu;
So we'll keep armel-only for now, and first fix the issue with the
mesa-dev package. Later would be nice to have this fixed.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Fathi Boudra <email address hidden> wrote: HAVE_EGLIMAGE) ..
> On 4 January 2012 15:56, Rob Clark <email address hidden> wrote:
>> it is orthogonal to gstreamer.. possibly we need to introduce an #if
>> defined(
>>
>> is it possible to just disable building on x86 for now? Ie. linaro
>> doesn't really need to release x86 packages.
>
> We have already done that as a workaround.
We were interested at the fix for basically 2 reasons:
1 - The common packages are generated by the x86 build at Launchpad
(the workaround was to have it all for armel only);
2 - We want our patches to not break the normal use case, so later on
we can also propose the changes at Ubuntu;
So we'll keep armel-only for now, and first fix the issue with the
mesa-dev package. Later would be nice to have this fixed.
Cheers,
--
Ricardo Salveti de Araujo