18:06 < seb128> asac, hey
18:06 < seb128> asac, https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/overlay/+sourcepub/1962819/+listing-archive-extra
18:07 < seb128> asac, could you guys not divert ubuntu package using official versions numbers? i.e ~linaro those? ;-)
18:10 < asac> seb128: yep thats wrong ... will forward your complain
18:10 < asac> seb128: is that version now taken?
18:10 < asac> e.g. did you upload ubuntu2?
18:10 < seb128> asac, not yet
18:10 < seb128> asac, thanks for complaining
18:10 < asac> seb128: how did you spot?
18:10 < seb128> asac, btw that version is broken
18:10 < seb128> asac, tseliot hit a but in this version that he got on an oem image
18:10 < seb128> but->bug
18:11 < asac> k
18:11 < seb128> asac, gconf was multiarched but the dbus .service is in an arch:all binary
18:11 < seb128> asac, so the path is the i386 one
18:11 < seb128> which breaks the service activation on other arches
18:06 < seb128> asac, hey /launchpad. net/~linaro- maintainers/ +archive/ overlay/ +sourcepub/ 1962819/ +listing- archive- extra
18:06 < seb128> asac, https:/
18:07 < seb128> asac, could you guys not divert ubuntu package using official versions numbers? i.e ~linaro those? ;-)
18:10 < asac> seb128: yep thats wrong ... will forward your complain
18:10 < asac> seb128: is that version now taken?
18:10 < asac> e.g. did you upload ubuntu2?
18:10 < seb128> asac, not yet
18:10 < seb128> asac, thanks for complaining
18:10 < asac> seb128: how did you spot?
18:10 < seb128> asac, btw that version is broken
18:10 < seb128> asac, tseliot hit a but in this version that he got on an oem image
18:10 < seb128> but->bug
18:11 < asac> k
18:11 < seb128> asac, gconf was multiarched but the dbus .service is in an arch:all binary
18:11 < seb128> asac, so the path is the i386 one
18:11 < seb128> which breaks the service activation on other arches