Hmm... The discussion in that email thread (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/22/294 - Thank you Botao!) points to: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854 And this seems to be in perfect agreement with my comment #3. I am not 100% sure yet (need to take a better look at the generated code), but it does look like that gcc bug.
Hmm... The discussion in that email thread (https:/ /lkml.org/ lkml/2014/ 1/22/294 - Thank you Botao!) points to: gcc.gnu. org/bugzilla/ show_bug. cgi?id= 58854
http://
And this seems to be in perfect agreement with my comment #3. I am not 100% sure yet (need to take a better look at the generated code), but it does look like that gcc bug.