On 21 November 2011 14:39, Guilherme Salgado
<email address hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 07:34 +0000, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>> On 20 November 2011 23:53, Loïc Minier <email address hidden> wrote:
>> > do you have a link to a failing build log?
>>
>> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/85393724/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-i386
>> .linaro-image-tools_2011.11-0ubuntu1~linaro1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
>>
>
> This one was because of a missing apt-utils in build-depends, it seems.
>
>> > (current builds are passing, so not sure which series is
> problematic)
>
> I think Ricardo added apt-utils to build-depends but there was yet
> another failure (bug 892391) so he ended up disabling the test suite for
> the time being.
The latest upload has only test suite disabled. apt-utils and
dosfstools are both missing.
It worths a retry and see if it fixes the issue on PPA.
On 21 November 2011 14:39, Guilherme Salgado /launchpadlibra rian.net/ 85393724/ buildlog_ ubuntu- oneiric- i386 image-tools_ 2011.11- 0ubuntu1~ linaro1_ FAILEDTOBUILD. txt.gz
<email address hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 07:34 +0000, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>> On 20 November 2011 23:53, Loïc Minier <email address hidden> wrote:
>> > do you have a link to a failing build log?
>>
>> https:/
>> .linaro-
>>
>
> This one was because of a missing apt-utils in build-depends, it seems.
>
>> > (current builds are passing, so not sure which series is
> problematic)
>
> I think Ricardo added apt-utils to build-depends but there was yet
> another failure (bug 892391) so he ended up disabling the test suite for
> the time being.
The latest upload has only test suite disabled. apt-utils and
dosfstools are both missing.
It worths a retry and see if it fixes the issue on PPA.