On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
<email address hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:37:57 -0000, Ricardo Salveti
> <email address hidden> wrote:
>
>> The good thing about running it in the chroot is that we don't need to
>> care about security issues at the host side that much.
>
> Apart from the bit where chroots do not provide security?
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
<email address hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:37:57 -0000, Ricardo Salveti
> <email address hidden> wrote:
>
>> The good thing about running it in the chroot is that we don't need to
>> care about security issues at the host side that much.
>
> Apart from the bit where chroots do not provide security?
But it's safer at least.