On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:33:56 -0000
Zach Pfeffer <email address hidden> wrote:
> I think this bug takes the discussion in the wrong direction - though
> I'm glad you filed it Paul. With CI we'll have official builds coming
> out everyday/hour etc. We should just be able to just mark one of the
> many builds that completes as "official" and have the build system
> automatically retain it - the build system could automatically save
> the pinned manifest on the release branch and kick off the release
> build from it. We could then gate the people who could save builds.
This bug is about build system as it is now, not about
CI-yet-to-be-done.
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:33:56 -0000
Zach Pfeffer <email address hidden> wrote:
> I think this bug takes the discussion in the wrong direction - though
> I'm glad you filed it Paul. With CI we'll have official builds coming
> out everyday/hour etc. We should just be able to just mark one of the
> many builds that completes as "official" and have the build system
> automatically retain it - the build system could automatically save
> the pinned manifest on the release branch and kick off the release
> build from it. We could then gate the people who could save builds.
This bug is about build system as it is now, not about
CI-yet-to-be-done.
--
Best Regards,
Paul
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs www.facebook. com/pages/ Linaro twitter. com/#!/ linaroorg - http:// www.linaro. org/linaro- blog
Follow Linaro: http://
http://