On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:24:49 -0000, Alexander Sack <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Frans Gifford
> <email address hidden>wrote:
>
> > Feel free to mark as invalid if you think this is the correct behaviour.
> >
> >
> maybe a third state: SUCCESSWITHPROBLEMS would be another option? Not sure
> how easy that is to do on jenkins. I guess this stuff ultimately needs to be
> visualized on a lava dashboard with info like: build, lava submission, boot,
> tests etc. in one shot.
It's quite hard to visualise problems with submitting to LAVA on LAVA
itself :-)
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:24:49 -0000, Alexander Sack <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Frans Gifford
> <email address hidden>wrote:
>
> > Feel free to mark as invalid if you think this is the correct behaviour.
> >
> >
> maybe a third state: SUCCESSWITHPROBLEMS would be another option? Not sure
> how easy that is to do on jenkins. I guess this stuff ultimately needs to be
> visualized on a lava dashboard with info like: build, lava submission, boot,
> tests etc. in one shot.
It's quite hard to visualise problems with submitting to LAVA on LAVA
itself :-)
Thanks,
James