Comment 10 for bug 659495

Revision history for this message
Simon Schubert (corecode) wrote :

I had a look again at the patch. The problem is that the change is rather big, and, as far as I can tell, mixed with other changes. I admit that the existing code is messy in most parts, mostly because the code that I revived was based on an ancient version of the gdata addon. However, I'd like to avoid adding code that hacks in a feature - instead, any new code should be easily readable and at the right place of the abstraction. To me, the code submission is not easy to follow, so I'd rather integrate a version that is.