On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Ville M. Vainio <email address hidden> wrote:
> QQQ
>
> If tab and shift-tab indent/outdent text in the body when there's an
> active selection, is there a need for Ctrl-] and Ctrl-[ bindings for
> indent/outdent? There not exactly the same, as the tab bindings
> require an active selection.
>
> QQQ
>
> +1 for removing ctrl+] and ctrl + [ bindings. ctrl + { and ctrl + }
> bindings (pro/demote) work ok for me, but indent/unindent "special"
> bindings don't need to be around when we have tab / untab.
I agree that tab and shift-tab suffice. Feel free to remove these bindings
from leoSettings.leo if you like. Please run the check-bindings script
buttons after doing so.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Ville M. Vainio <email address hidden> wrote:
> QQQ
>
> If tab and shift-tab indent/outdent text in the body when there's an
> active selection, is there a need for Ctrl-] and Ctrl-[ bindings for
> indent/outdent? There not exactly the same, as the tab bindings
> require an active selection.
>
> QQQ
>
> +1 for removing ctrl+] and ctrl + [ bindings. ctrl + { and ctrl + }
> bindings (pro/demote) work ok for me, but indent/unindent "special"
> bindings don't need to be around when we have tab / untab.
I agree that tab and shift-tab suffice. Feel free to remove these bindings
from leoSettings.leo if you like. Please run the check-bindings script
buttons after doing so.
Edward