Comment 16 for bug 881292

Ah. OK. Misunderstood. Of course, the output of l-m-c -h told you that LAVA was using the old one.

Sorry about that.

On 26 Oct 2011, at 09:31, Mattias Backman wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Dave Pigott <email address hidden> wrote:
>> When we deprecate options it breaks automated systems. Maybe we should
>> try to take care in the future to support the old behaviour with a
>> "deprecated" warning being issued, and not remove the support until the
>> next release?
>
> Actually the old options are not touched at all, they still work and
> there's no plan for removing them. The only reason there's no
> deprecation warning is that adding the aliases was trivial and adding
> deprecation messages would take a little (admittedly very little)
> effort. We can make sure to add warnings a couple of releases before
> the old options are removed, if they ever will be.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Linaro
> Validation Team, which is subscribed to LAVA Dispatcher.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881292
>
> Title:
> --image-file and --image-size do not work in l-m-c
>
> Status in LAVA Dispatcher:
> Confirmed
> Status in Linaro Image Tools:
> Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> The lava-dispatcher is failing to deploy the images. Here is the trace
> of the error:
>
> root@master:~# [rc=0]: <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2011-10-25 07:30:02 AM INFO: About to handle with the build
> <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2011-10-25 07:30:02 AM INFO: Downloading the http://ci.linaro.org/kernel_hwpack/linux-arm-soc-for-next/linux-arm-soc-for-next_panda-omap2plus/hwpack_linaro-panda_20111025-0725_b144_armel_supported.tar.gz file using cache
> <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2011-10-25 07:44:02 AM INFO: Downloading the http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-nano/20111024/0/images/tar/nano-n-tar-20111024-0.tar.gz file using cache
> <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2011-10-25 07:44:02 AM INFO: Executing the linaro-media-create command
> <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2011-10-25 07:44:02 AM INFO: sudo flock /var/lock/lava-lmc.lck linaro-media-create --hwpack-force-yes --dev panda --image-file /linaro/images/tmp/tmpeSFdyh/lava.img --binary /linaro/images/tmp/tmpeSFdyh/nano-n-tar-20111024-0.tar.gz --hwpack /linaro/images/tmp/tmpeSFdyh/hwpack_linaro-panda_20111025-0725_b144_armel_supported.tar.gz --image-size 3G
> None
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lava_dispatcher/actions/deploy.py", line 66, in run
> use_cache)
> File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lava_dispatcher/actions/deploy.py", line 176, in generate_tarballs
> raise RuntimeError("linaro-media-create failed: %s" % output)
> RuntimeError: linaro-media-create failed: /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/argparse.py:1576: DeprecationWarning: The "version" argument to ArgumentParser is deprecated. Please use "add_argument(..., action='version', version="N", ...)" instead
> """instead""", DeprecationWarning)
> usage: linaro-media-create [-h] [-v] (--mmc DEVICE | --image_file DEVICE)
> --dev
> {overo,vexpress,mx53loco,snowball_emmc,panda,ux500,igep,mx51evk,smdkv310,snowball_sd,beagle,efikamx,origen,efikasb}
> [--rootfs {ext2,ext3,ext4,btrfs}]
> [--rfs_label RFS_LABEL] [--boot_label BOOT_LABEL]
> [--swap_file SWAP_FILE] [--live | --live-256m]
> [--console CONSOLES] --hwpack HWPACKS
> [--hwpack-sig HWPACKSIGS] [--hwpack-force-yes]
> [--image_size IMAGE_SIZE] --binary BINARY
> [--binary-sig BINARYSIG] [--no-rootfs]
> [--no-bootfs] [--no-part] [--align-boot-part]
> [--nocheck-mmc]
> linaro-media-create: error: one of the arguments --mmc --image_file is required
> Lava failed at action deploy_linaro_image with error: Deployment tarballs preparation failed
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lava_dispatcher/__init__.py", line 79, in run
> action.run(**params)
> File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lava_dispatcher/actions/deploy.py", line 70, in run
> raise CriticalError("Deployment tarballs preparation failed")
> CriticalError: Deployment tarballs preparation failed
>
>
> You can refer to the job http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/scheduler/job/2918 which failed as an example failure.
> I guess the lava-dispatcher is not completely adopting the latest l-m-c changes.
>
> Thanks!!!
> Deepti.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/lava-dispatcher/+bug/881292/+subscriptions