I'm working around this temporarily by just using --image_file. If you use --image-file though, it complains. I've tried this on twi different machines:
$ sudo linaro-media-create --hwpack-force-yes --dev panda --hwpack hwpack_linaro-lt-panda_20111019-0_armel_supported.tar.gz --binary nano-n-tar-20111019-0.tar.gz --image-file foo.img
usage: linaro-media-create [-h] [-v] (--mmc DEVICE | --image_file DEVICE) --dev {overo,vexpress,mx53loco,snowball_emmc,panda,ux500,igep,mx51evk,smdkv310,snowball_sd,beagle,efikamx,origen,efikasb} [--rootfs {ext2,ext3,ext4,btrfs}] [--rfs_label RFS_LABEL] [--boot_label BOOT_LABEL] [--swap_file SWAP_FILE] [--live | --live-256m] [--console CONSOLES] --hwpack HWPACKS [--hwpack-sig HWPACKSIGS] [--hwpack-force-yes] [--image_size IMAGE_SIZE] --binary BINARY [--binary-sig BINARYSIG] [--no-rootfs] [--no-bootfs] [--no-part] [--align-boot-part] [--nocheck-mmc]
linaro-media-create: error: one of the arguments --mmc --image_file is required
I'm working around this temporarily by just using --image_file. If you use --image-file though, it complains. I've tried this on twi different machines: linaro- lt-panda_ 20111019- 0_armel_ supported. tar.gz --binary nano-n- tar-20111019- 0.tar.gz --image-file foo.img
- -dev
{ overo,vexpress, mx53loco, snowball_ emmc,panda, ux500,igep, mx51evk, smdkv310, snowball_ sd,beagle, efikamx, origen, efikasb}
[ --rootfs {ext2,ext3, ext4,btrfs} ]
[ --rfs_label RFS_LABEL] [--boot_label BOOT_LABEL]
[ --swap_ file SWAP_FILE] [--live | --live-256m]
[ --console CONSOLES] --hwpack HWPACKS
[ --hwpack- sig HWPACKSIGS] [--hwpack- force-yes]
[ --image_ size IMAGE_SIZE] --binary BINARY
[ --binary- sig BINARYSIG] [--no-rootfs]
[ --no-bootfs] [--no-part] [--align-boot-part]
[ --nocheck- mmc] media-create: error: one of the arguments --mmc --image_file is required
$ sudo linaro-media-create --hwpack-force-yes --dev panda --hwpack hwpack_
usage: linaro-media-create [-h] [-v] (--mmc DEVICE | --image_file DEVICE)
linaro-