I agree. Currently l-d-t remoteworker installations assume the DB resides on the LAVA_MASTER.
We should use (and document) a variable, such as LAVA_DB_MASTER to allow a installer to identify a specific DB Server address.
If that environment variable is not set, we then use the LAVA_MASTER (as we do today, maintaining backwards-compatibility)
I agree. Currently l-d-t remoteworker installations assume the DB resides on the LAVA_MASTER.
We should use (and document) a variable, such as LAVA_DB_MASTER to allow a installer to identify a specific DB Server address.
If that environment variable is not set, we then use the LAVA_MASTER (as we do today, maintaining backwards- compatibility)