Comment 3 for bug 931029

The bug age displayed for each bug in the listing does seem to match up with the bug number. For example, a bug that's showing as two years old has a bug number starting 390, whereas a one year old bug starts 661 and an even more recent bug starts with 880.

So, I'd assume the bug age displayed is correct: i.e. the bug report itself is the age displayed.

My hunch is that the list is actually ordered by the date that the bug was marked as affecting the network-manager project.

A solution to this would be to have two separate items: the age since the bug itself was created and the age since that bug was marked as affecting your project.

We'll be making some updates to the new bug listings style soon and I'll aim to have this disparity fixed as part of that work.