Comment 12 for bug 91925
Revision history for this message
| Christian Reis (kiko) wrote Re: [Bug 91925] Re: Automatically expire old Needs Info bug reports | #12 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 12:52:39PM -0000, Marco Rodrigues wrote:
> I think the better should be 3 months, it's an intermediate number
> between 1 and 6 (every 6 months, there is a new distro release).
I'm okay with starting with 3 months, though I do think it's a pretty
long time.
> Expired bugs will have the same status of a fix released, I mean,
> doesn't appear in listing, only in search or filebug and don't count for
> statistics.
Well, they'll be more similar to Invalid (we could just use the Invalid
status, but I think that's not a very good way of tracking them), but
yes, they won't appear in any default listings, and won't count for
statistics. It'd be an interesting idea to have them match in the
filebug listings though -- hadn't considered that.