Comment 2 for bug 904339

I switched the call from bug_supervisor to structural_subscriber because that is what the field actually searched...packages do not have bug supervisors. The structural_subscriber field is correct what what we want to do, but I think the implementation does more work than anyone really asks it. I think the teams; structural subscriptions for products and milestones are also being examined, we know the context is distribution. We may want the logic to only select the subscriptions for the bugtarget and subordinate objects. The bug_supervisor field was also doing the same stupid approach of checking if you are the bug supervisor for a product when the bugtarget is ubuntu.

There are three other bugs reported about the time of bug and I recently saw issues with bug heat qastaging. The issue may be about bugheat.