Comment 11 for bug 835103
Revision history for this message
| Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote Re: [Bug 835103] Re: HWDB submissions since Lucid are marked as Invalid | #11 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
We already tell the client that the submission failed
On 29/08/2011 11:30 PM, "Abel Deuring" <email address hidden> wrote:
Francis J. Lacoste (flacoste) wrote on 2011-08-26:
> We should also question the fact that these Invalid submissions have been
unreported for over a y...
- the QA team could check the processing logs on a regular basis. Especially
when a new Ubuntu version is released.
- Processing a submission needs ca 1 second, so we could do that during the
upload request. If we provide a proper RESTful API, checkbox could get an
immediate error response.
- checkbox could do a RelaxNG verification before submitting a report. If we
publish the RelaxNG schema used by Launchpad to process submissions via an
HTTP URL and if checkbox uses the file from this URL for verification, we
can be much more sure than now that checkbox and Launchpad don't have, let's
say, "communication problems".
- we should do more QA on the Launchpad side when a new checkbox version is
released. (BTW, it there a way to subscribe to the event "new version of
package X released"?)
--
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to
Launchpad Suite.
https:/