Comment 9 for bug 830584
Revision history for this message
| Stefano Rivera (stefanor) wrote Re: [Bug 830584] Re: Concerns about the use of +localpackagediffs in Ubuntu | #9 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
> build\d+$ is also Ubuntu specific :)
Of course, I think the meaning is relatively unambiguous, but that
doesn't mean it should be used without agreement in the derivatives. And
yes, it could plausibly result in -1build1build1 :/
> Note also that we have an outstanding bug about no-change rebuilds in LP which
> might make this moot though.
I think it's also an option to ignore this issue, the Ubuntu developer
can confirm the sync when LP says "there's a delta: foo-1build1" because
they no it means no-change-rebuild.
> Yup, we're working on that. I need to fix bug 827576 first.
Agreed, thanks.
> Thanks for the continuing feedback and sorry if I sounded ungrateful earlier -
> I'm not, you just caught me at a bad time. Everyone's getting a little burned
> out from working on this feature for so long.
NP, I can understand the frustration :)