Comment 16 for bug 814632
Revision history for this message
| Marten de Vries (marten-de-vries) wrote | #16 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
'So is your newly pushed-up branch still broken?'
Yes. (e.g. OOPS-ID OOPS-2062CBA489)
'You're saying that 3.x is fine, I'm wondering if there is just a bad
revision in the history of 2.x that is being processed.'
If that's the case, I've no idea how that could've been introduced. We used that revisions (I saw revno: 122 a few posts back) for a pretty long time before they started giving problems.