Comment 5 for bug 788612
Revision history for this message
| Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote Re: [Bug 788612] Re: Allow running Jobs to mark themselves as suspended | #5 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Julian Edwards
<email address hidden> wrote:
> On Friday 27 May 2011 04:40:44 you wrote:
>> Ah, I think there is a layering confusion here.
>>
>> At the package layer we certainly need to know that there is something
>> waiting for an archive admin to approve.
>>
>> At the queue layer we don't want stuff in a queue that can't be
>> processed: they shouldn't be queued for handling by the job runner.
>
> Why not?
Its incompatible design wise with zeromq/rabbitmq etc. Stuff in a
queue needs to be actionable.
-Rob