> Generally we wait for a user to tell us if a given branch isn't
> scanning; we expect users to break branches from time to time and
> focus on having the scanner run and attempt to scan reliably.
That's true. However, if thousands of branches are failing, something's probably wrong beyond just normal background radiation. I agree with putting it to Low.
> Generally we wait for a user to tell us if a given branch isn't
> scanning; we expect users to break branches from time to time and
> focus on having the scanner run and attempt to scan reliably.
That's true. However, if thousands of branches are failing, something's probably wrong beyond just normal background radiation. I agree with putting it to Low.