On Monday 06 December 2010 19:12:56 you wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Julian Edwards
>
> <email address hidden> wrote:
> > Hello? QA bot?
>
> Hi Julian, the bot should or shouldn't have touched this bug? Revno
> 11986 has this bug number on its branch nick:
> timeouts-feature-bug-681426. Is that wrong somehow?
Yeah I was confused because I hadn't linked the branch - then I realised that
I'd stupidly put the wrong bug number on the branch nick!
I think that it might be better to let people explicitly link branches but
that's just me. Worth asking around?
On Monday 06 December 2010 19:12:56 you wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Julian Edwards
>
> <email address hidden> wrote:
> > Hello? QA bot?
>
> Hi Julian, the bot should or shouldn't have touched this bug? Revno
> 11986 has this bug number on its branch nick:
> timeouts-feature-bug-681426. Is that wrong somehow?
Yeah I was confused because I hadn't linked the branch - then I realised that
I'd stupidly put the wrong bug number on the branch nick!
I think that it might be better to let people explicitly link branches but
that's just me. Worth asking around?
Thanks!