Comment 5 for bug 661441

Revision history for this message
Diogo Matsubara (matsubara) wrote :

Robert, I disagree. I think this should be high because this is making the lpnet oops report useless with all the noise from the checkwatches OOPSes.

Stuart, how are the new OOPSes unique enough to filter them in the reports? I'm not in favor of filtering them in the reports as we'd basically be hiding the problem which is the same oops recorded twice.